My concern comes from the fact the S1Evo2 is older than the v12 evo2. And due to material and design advancement the newer ones will usually be better if they are of the same category.Both are true UHP class but yes S1E2 is supposed to be the flagship and the most reviewed/compared against PS*, F1*, PZero, etc2. Note though the V12E2 was compared by Car and Driver magazine against PS4S, F1A3, Continental ECS, and it came out 3rd ahead of F1A3! So not bad for a tire costing only half or even less than those flagships.
F1A5 seems to have gain back some ground. CPC6 seems holding up to the challenge against the Max/UHP tyresThis is a good test including the latest F1A5 and S1E3, plus the usual PS4, FK510, PZero, and CPC6.
Yes F1A5 has catch up a bit and CPC6 apparently lives up to its claim to upgrade as true uhp class replacing CSC5. It's disappointing that Continental Malaysia doesn't bring it here!F1A5 seems to have gain back some ground. CPC6 seems holding up to the challenge against the Max/UHP tyres
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Hankook V12 Evo 2 Launched||Wheel And Tyre||11|
|S||Hankook v12 or Yokohama CD2: 195/55/15||Wheel And Tyre||3|
|K||Want good deal for Hankook V12EVO@V8RS..size 215@225/45/R17..KL||Wheel And Tyre||3|
|A||Hankook V12 Evo||Wheel And Tyre||2|
|federal 595 evo vs hankook v12 vs michelin pp2||Wheel And Tyre||13|