Between 1.8 na n 1.8 turbocharged,which 1 is value for money for years of 97 model (wira) these day?Really need u guys opinion ASAP because need to do something to my car..
Agreed. NA is really expensive to mod. Take a look at how much BMW owners spending on their cars... not to mention the price of halfcuts.rollakid said:when talk about money and na vs turbo, one more thing to think about is the money you spend to mod the engine. sure NA might be cheaper overall to maintain but depends very much on what mod you do to it and how you drive it, and turbocharged engine can be very economical too and also depend on many factors.
but one thing you can't run away is that with NA, you can spend thousands and thousands and get few HP extra, while with the same amount of money you can really make your car fly.
so i dunno if any of you will agree with my point of view, but to me NA is more like expensive modification and slightly cheaper maintenance if tuned properly, while turbo you get the best bang of your buck per horse power gain, but pay more on maintenance and fuel.
yeah.. although i love the kepishhh sound but then takes damn alot of willpower to control myself from modding turbo. damn expensive la.. everybody now say "will save from how u drive la, bla bla bla" .. but who won't press when they have turbo? all sure wanna go fast wan if got nice road ahead..ziranath said:u guys have lots of money eh...one time the kepishhhhh sound it could be rm2 for the fuel..but then it depends to personal interest right?
i find those kind of people with that kind of thinking very shallow and totally sohai. so egoistic.. :rolleyes: wat la.. on fast lane ady ppl wanna pass u gonna stay there? damn thick skin weih..zan said:when we drive V6 sure ourselves also dun want to give way to lesser powered cars. aren't we?