What i meant by personal attack is actual harm, a threatening of violence. As I've mention earlier, this is an grey area as everybody has their tolerance to how much flaming one can take.
Nope, what i meant is, rude comment = flame bait. Comment with intent of provoking an response in terms of even more rude comments or valid point. In this case DarkChild responded with a valid point to the flame bait.
Yeah but I did make a point on the whole issue as explained.
LOL can't belive you fell right for it. You have just proven my opinions.
Isn't this post politically incorrect ? but nevertheless had a valid point in the end ?
Geez...obviously you can't really read
As i mentioned earlier my view on this is not conclusive as the posts have been edited. Instead of getting all defensive of your actions, or rather sounding guilty for it, you mentioned earlier there was an interchange of PMs. Maybe you can post some of it ?. I understand the purpose of you highlighting that case is to avoid the locked thread from becoming such as case.
lol...who are you to judge anyway?again,try pm soneone or use search function.
LOL its a discussion, not everybody is going to have a same opinion, hence a forum to discuss it. So if somebody has a different opinion from you, that opinion is automatically wrong ?.
which statement of mine saying you are wrong?both of us are just giving our opinion & carry on the discussion but someone who have no idea what happened jumping his leg & interpreted replies here in his own way.
My fair game view is getting proven at its finest IMO, we get to see some peoples level of disagreeableness in this thread, as i said earlier, dude you need to chill a little.
I would like to apologize if you have taken my points of using your actions as an example of my fair game view.
lol...now acting innocent after heat up the thread?
I hope thats not a personal threat or 5115 would have to lock the thread.
---------- Post added at 05:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 PM ----------
K Takuya, Reason for the back and forth exchanges - I don't see the problem in discussing mod actions as long its constructive ? I mean there is always choices to actions to be taken, my point of this thread ultimately is to discuss what is the best course of action to moderate thread.
Here we go again...read all the replies above,try ask something new dude lol....is getting proven that you can't really read or you just read what u wanted
TitanRev, I agree with your style of moderation, classy. I'm not here to offend anybody, just trying to offer my view, that despite a thread being negative or politically incorrect, there are also points trying to be made. If its just an outright flame, it would reflect the poster's level of maturity by itself.
hope you could really read,or else same lame post will be appear again
Diablo, VR38DETT is a V6 not a V8. LOL
tks for this example... another forum which has strict moderation and also implements penalty point system is evolutionm.net
that is your yardstick to gauge personal attack. as a forum moderator, they are responsible to stop personal attacks in the form of written words as well. it is wrong to impose your standards against those of a forum. if you have suggestions on how to improve it, you can always pm the moderators or Tom directly. bear in mind that as a guest at someone else's house, we have no rights to make demands on how they run their houses. this isn't about freedom of speech or anything, this is about imposing on someone else when clearly we don't have the right to. :wavey:
no one is disputing anything or ignoring any valid points here. i believe the mods are just telling you time and again why they have closed the thread - unnecessary comments.
which i believe everyone agrees but it doesn't mean that we should allow them to continue or encourage them to continue to be rude or unruly right? :wavey:
of which the main message is DRIVE RESPONSIBLY, and was already expressed in numerous ways. what else is there to say?
oh... for a moment, what you wrote sounded like DC was flame baiting. my bad for misunderstanding your words. :wavey:
by this statement, you mean that you would still force your will on the girl? whether you're coaxing her or demanding from her, its pretty much the same. she doesn't want it but you still insist. fuyoh...
uncle fstrader did u try before eat popcorn with salt & drink beer, taste damn nice ler
I understand the troubles with my points to allow such threads to run. In no way I'm telling how the forum should be operated. My comments are merely suggestions in which I feel strongly about in which it may be misunderstood for commands. Whether its taken or not its subject to Tom's discretion.
Reason for my replies often repeating itself, is merely my attempt to explain my point to those who yet to understand it.
As for the rude replies without comments, it would only make them look shallow and hence my point of the flamebait. By making themselves an easy target to be "taruh-ed", I guess they would soon realise that they have to come with better replies and hopefully in the long run comeout with constructive ones. I guess i have mentioned this in my reply to you earlier - "We all fear the day where insult/flames become faux pas and would turn into constructive arguments.". Fear in this case meaning that by locking the thread such improvements can occur - letting its thread run its course.
One of the other issue left hanging is the final post in the thread, whether similar comments would arise if a such a accident happens to a senior member. I would also like to discuss whether its allowed for P drivers to drive such cars as first cars. If I'm not mistaken its legally required to have a more advanced for higher CC motorbikes. Again, as stated earlier, this is merely suggestion of points to be discussed in the thread.
No issues, I'm here to explain myself, not hurl unnecessary remarks.
Instead of the guys insisting can't the girl insist too since she's the who's "hot" in the first place ?. Like the Nike advert theme, always look on the bright side of life ?
kindly raise some other enquiries instead of repeating it again & again,answers were there in our replies.Try something like what diablo did.
Isn't this statement an oxymoron since replies may be interpreted differently by individuals and thus the very reason for the discussion - to clarify such differences ?.
I'd rather be an optimist who thinks that the quality of the forums would increase then be a sad pessimist who thinks that constructive posts would not outnumber rude posts and just let the quality level be at status quo.
:boxing:.......
