B-series with Ron95?97?

  • See what others are reading now! Try Forums > Current Activity
  • Search function more powerful with google results! Try Search

khoo198

1,500 RPM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
1,948
Points
1,713
Location
N9
Hi,all........can B16/18/20 runs with our government new launching petrol Ron95? or still need to pay more 5cents/liter for petrol Ron97?Hope can get some suggestion here........Thx..!!
 
no problems lah

our american counterparts are putting 89 into their tanks of their B-, F- and H-series.

no problems there.

even their latest k24a, J35a are burning 92RON.
 
WTF!!!not only pay more 5cents/liter,is 25cents/liter after Sept09'.....!!!That mean Ron95 only can afford.....!!


quite different standards.

have to get clarification from a petroleum engineer :D

Got few petroleum engineer in our country la Bro......but got a lot of supra-class+exceed accountant............!!!!!!!!!
 
but from what i've read, and understood ... high compression engines shouldnt use low ron fuels, it can cause severe knocking....in the US im not sure if petrol grades are the same.Honestly im not a scientist so i cant really touch in depth about that.My mech also mentioned that it will be a bad idea to use ron95.its not CANNOT use, just becareful,if theres severe knocking,youre most likely gonna detonate.
 
I read in the civic service manual (EG) that B16A can run on RON95 or greater...
 
Ron 95 or Ron 97 almost the same, but still have small differents. :D
 
Ron 95 or Ron 97 almost the same, but still have small differents. :D

Confirm have different la bro.....if not huhh why can differ to 0.30/ltr:mad::mad:
:listen::listen:How about B18C? I think mayB continue using ron97 laa.......:bawling::bawling:dompet bocor OOOooooo
 
I read in the civic service manual (EG) that B16A can run on RON95 or greater...

yeah.. on OEM b16a of course no harmful.. but can we trust those "b16a" in msian road?? i dont think so he he he:biggrin:
 
ya ya ya... its true... esp sepat's car.... praaannnnnggggggggggggg cabutsss...

miahahahhahahahahahahahha...
 
yo dawg..

still up and running eh?? how come never saw your car at Paroi jaya nowadays?:proud:
 
If ron 95 and 97 not so different, then 97 and 100 is not so much different too right?:biggrin:
 
if your car is stock, then i guess its fine to follow as the manual says.But if you have upgraded your engine and components, its a different thing right? since the air flow has increased it requires more fuel to cmplete the combustion,if a lower grade of petrol is used,it can cause knocking,if its severe it can lead up to detonation.(sifus please correct me if im wrong).

and for those who have already tuned their cars with piggybacks,wouldnt using a different grade of octane cause severe changes in readings?
 
You can use a lower grade fuel if you are concern about the price... ron 95 will still be ok. Just don't go for 90 or lower, coz you'll definitely lose power. Good thing we have knock sensors installed, it'll automatically retard the timing if a knock is heard... thus losing power also. Anyway, i'll be the bad guy who'll say just go ahead and use the RON 95, it'll be ok and your car will still be within safety zone provided knock sensor is still there and working...
 
You can use a lower grade fuel if you are concern about the price... ron 95 will still be ok. Just don't go for 90 or lower, coz you'll definitely lose power. Good thing we have knock sensors installed, it'll automatically retard the timing if a knock is heard... thus losing power also. Anyway, i'll be the bad guy who'll say just go ahead and use the RON 95, it'll be ok and your car will still be within safety zone provided knock sensor is still there and working...


owhhh,how about cars which are already tuned with piggybacks?
 
That is a no... unless it has a knock retarding function.. but my advice is no... hehehe
 

A thread every 60 seconds


Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience
Top Bottom